<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Upgrading from s24 plus in Galaxy S25</title>
    <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Official-Galaxy-S25-S25-amp-S25-Ultra-Shipping-and-Feedback/m-p/3120247#M1848</link>
    <description>I'm speaking on the Note/Ultra line because that's been my phone choice since the Note II. That said. Great job to everyone for speaking up. We can't be "Yes" men praising these bad decisions. If Samsung wants to sell a device that's stripped down, have at it and charge $800-$900 for it but leave my phone with all its features. I need them. Plus how can I flex on the iPhone and Pixel users if I have nothing to flex with? Just a thought. But seriously you're going down the wrong direction Samsung.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:52:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>XJCAR</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-23T14:52:38Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

