<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Expert Raw - double-press of side button requires unlock in Galaxy S25</title>
    <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Expert-Raw-double-press-of-side-button-requires-unlock/m-p/3209952#M20517</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That's a bold claim. If it's truly a fact, kindly provide your sources, because what you're claiming simply doesn't hold up logically.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The double-press gesture launches the default camera app without requiring unlock. I did not program this behavior; it's the system default.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this were genuinely a security measure, it would apply consistently, including to the default camera app. It doesn't. Therefore, it's not a security measure. It’s an inconsistency.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moreover, the app opens without requiring unlock when accessed via a different method (quick launch shortcut, ON the lockscreen). This clearly shows it was simply overlooked. It should behave the same way as the default app.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And yes, I did already send my feedback to Samsung in the Members app.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;P.S.: You are in fact arguing.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2025 01:03:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hunex</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-27T01:03:50Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

