<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: S25 Ultra Camera Issue. in Galaxy S25</title>
    <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/S25-Ultra-Camera-Issue/m-p/3322293#M31163</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;But&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/44954960"&gt;@jgm509&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;stated that using a 3rd party app provided what looked like realistic images. Ngl, I don't think Samsung can create any better SDK to make better photo taking as it is peaked out, else this would have happened by now. The last camera update (in February) only addressed nighttime photo/video taking. The hardware has barely changed over the past 5 years so I do not know how much more can be squeezed out of it. Software can only do so much if the hardware is not changing on a noticeable metric, and that is highlighted by the processing power of the current best smartphone CPU going in the SD 8 Elite, which should aid in producing better and more realistic images.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 10:48:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tom6068</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-07T10:48:07Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

