<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Need better haptics at low level in Galaxy S25</title>
    <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513493#M53716</link>
    <description>Rumor has it that Ui9 is finally going to work on haptics.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Samsung in my opinion is the worst when it comes to haptics. It's not like they have a terrible vibration motor, it's actually pretty good.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:00:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Robin621k</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-24T16:00:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Need better haptics at low level</title>
      <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513473#M53713</link>
      <description>&lt;SPAN&gt;Need better haptics at even lower level. Pixel has amazing haptics like haptics on notification swipe, App drawer switching at very low level and I think this is the only thing I'm missing on one UI. Maybe Samsung should have a good look app for haptics : ).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 15:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513473#M53713</guid>
      <dc:creator>bhanp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-24T15:40:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Need better haptics at low level</title>
      <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513482#M53715</link>
      <description>Samsung phones have always had poor haptics. The vibration motor is more than capable, but Samsung purposely gimps haptics to save battery. Other OEMs, like Google and OnePlus, have it all over Samsung when it comes to the haptics part of user experience.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 15:49:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513482#M53715</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mujibar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-24T15:49:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Need better haptics at low level</title>
      <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513493#M53716</link>
      <description>Rumor has it that Ui9 is finally going to work on haptics.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Samsung in my opinion is the worst when it comes to haptics. It's not like they have a terrible vibration motor, it's actually pretty good.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:00:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513493#M53716</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robin621k</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-24T16:00:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Re: Need better haptics at low level</title>
      <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513496#M53717</link>
      <description>Better haptics would be welcome.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:05:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513496#M53717</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mujibar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-24T16:05:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Re: Re: Need better haptics at low level</title>
      <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513550#M53718</link>
      <description>The only thing missing on Samsung phones!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Samsung needs to stop nerfing their phones for better battery life and leave it to the user to decide what is important to them.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:29:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513550#M53718</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robin621k</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-24T16:29:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Need better haptics at low level</title>
      <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513584#M53720</link>
      <description>Well said</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 17:07:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3513584#M53720</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mujibar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-24T17:07:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Need better haptics at low level</title>
      <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3516929#M53983</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The ones that have the trash motor are A2* and below and Pixel doesn't compete in that price range&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 18:30:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S25/Need-better-haptics-at-low-level/m-p/3516929#M53983</guid>
      <dc:creator>celan_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-28T18:30:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

