<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Samsung 990 PRO 2TB: Performance Degradation After 7B2QJXD7 Firmware Upgrade - Capacity-Specific Bug? in Monitors and Memory</title>
    <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Monitors-and-Memory/Samsung-990-PRO-2TB-Performance-Degradation-After-7B2QJXD7/m-p/3403545#M17537</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I hesitate to even conjecture...how would I be able to test the M2_1 slot of my motherboard to know that it's OK?&amp;nbsp; That might explain why the 4TB in a different slot performs so differently and might even explain the Power On Hours discrepancy...but, then again, it might not.&amp;nbsp; If you have a recommendation for testing the slot, let me know.&amp;nbsp; I could swap the 2TB and 4TB drives and repeat the benchmarking, but I'm not confident that would prove anything.&amp;nbsp; Otherwise, I bought the 2TB and 4TB 990 Pro's (and the X870e Taichi motherboard) in February 2025.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Following up, I found a review of the 990 Pro 2TB that does a very good job of explaining SLC impact on benchmarking metrics.&amp;nbsp; My changing the fio runtime parameter is equivalent to looking at performance with different amounts of data written, as discussed in the review; effectively, I'm seeing performance either before or after the SLC cache is exhausted.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here's the link:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.techpowerup.com/review/samsung-990-pro-2-tb/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.techpowerup.com/review/samsung-990-pro-2-tb/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 22:42:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SFdrifter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-11-10T22:42:15Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

