<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Galaxy Buds Pro (1st Gen) owner thinking of getting the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro in Galaxy Buds</title>
    <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-Buds/Galaxy-Buds-Pro-1st-Gen-owner-thinking-of-getting-the-Galaxy/m-p/3303706#M37271</link>
    <description>I would wait too. One of the big issues reported a lot the week they were released was that the Buds3 Pro were very noisy outdoors in variable, gusty wind if ANC is enabled. Basically there is no protection for the microphones from noise caused by variable incident wind. Samsung will never acknowledge it other than by implication when they announce a Buds version with ANC does a great job in outdoor, windy environments. The Buds3 Pro sound great. Best set of headphones I had heard for years but I got tired of the bass emphasis, you can set a personal EQ config for the Buds3 Pro that helps a lot but I'm used to radio studio headphones that have a very flat frequency response and bought bluetooth over ear headphones with similar response. The Buds3 Pro have better noise reduction in non-windy locations but I still prefer the sound of the over ear phones.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 05:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>maird</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-19T05:00:51Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

