<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Samsung Health Oxygen saturation removed? in Samsung Apps and Services</title>
    <link>https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Samsung-Apps-and-Services/Samsung-Health-Oxygen-saturation-removed/m-p/1431459#M26406</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The SpO2 sensor on the phones measurement has a infrared sensor which measures un-oxygenated blood, but a UV sensor is also needed to measure the oxygenated blood, which the phones and watches do not have.&amp;nbsp; So they guestimate the O2 levels using only one side of the equation.&amp;nbsp; Numerous articles and YouTube videos have highlighted the poor accuracy of the phones and watches.&amp;nbsp; I believe Samsung decided no dodge the lawsuit bullet that could come if someone claims that false SpO2 readings caused them damage.&amp;nbsp; It probably will not return until/if they put in a UV sensor as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I use it anyway but like to check my phone levels with a doctors finger tip measuring tool which has both sensors and is more accurate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:14:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ezriderz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-18T16:14:18Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

