- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-24-2022 06:59 PM in
Monitors and Memory1 TB 860 with 313 GB. Reads in the 500 MB/s range but only writes 84 MB/s.
Trim is enabled. Blue sata connector 6 GB/s.
Swapped multiple good cables. No difference.
Bought new 870 EVO, migrated data, and did same benchmark. The 870 is performing on writes the way the 860 used to. No settings changed. Trim still enabled etc.
Everything else is equal except the two drives. The 860 firmware was out of date so I updated that incase there was a windows driver update of some sort requiring the 860 be on latest in case something was changed in windows that required a firmware update. No difference.
870 dashboard:
Plugged 860 back in and repeated test. Same results. The only conclusion I can come to is that the write speeds of the 860 decreased catastrophically due to age but it shouldn't be this slow.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-24-2022 09:45 PM in
Monitors and Memory
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-26-2022 03:30 PM in
Monitors and MemoryThis is a SATA connector, not PCI.
The point is that the 860 USED to have the same write speeds as the 870 that I just installed now does. No other differences except the drive itself.
Why is the 860 now so slow? It's literally 85% slower than it should be and the 870 installed on the same sata connector with the same cable is exactly the speed it should be.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-29-2022 12:07 AM in
Monitors and Memory
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-29-2022 12:15 AM in
Monitors and MemoryI do not have Intel RST nor do I have a RAID array.
When I run defrag, it says something like trim running and then completes in about 10 seconds. Makes no difference. One of the first things I tried.
Again, the new 870 has the expected write speed. The only difference here is the drives themselves and the slow drive USED to have the same write speed. No changes have been made. It became slow all on it's own.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-29-2022 12:25 AM in
Monitors and Memory
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-29-2022 12:41 AM in
Monitors and MemoryYes. Cloned. Again, the slow drive USED to be just as fast and has not had any changes to it's settings since it was fast.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-29-2022 12:56 AM in
Monitors and Memory
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-29-2022 01:50 AM in
Monitors and MemoryNo time passed. I got the new drive a few days a ago, cloned it, and tested the new drive and then retested the old drive. No difference in images and haven't actually installed any windows updates since.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-29-2022 12:18 AM in
Monitors and MemoryAt this point I'm going to assume that these drives just eventually become slow long before the the end of their expected lifespan. As such, I'm assuming this will happen to the 870 eventually, so I'm going to remove it, re-install the old drive, and then find a new brand that hopefully won't have this problem and never buy a Samsung SSD again. Done with them.

