S24 Ultra. AI "can't summarize because it might contain Inappropriate content"

[RevVass]

What's with this error when you go to summerize this article? This cant be real. Anything you can read, can be summarized. 

[The_Chief]

Apparently Bixby doesn't want to read anything that would destroy her childlike innocence...
😛

[PixySix]

I just got my Galaxy 24 and I hope there's a way to turn that off. Unless it's pop ups, spam, or I'm being hacked or something than my 50 years on this planet keeping myself "safe" after watching 'Faces of Death' as a teenager and so in should warrant me the decision maker on what I do with my phone. This fkng censorship was something we crushed ino with Tipper Gore in the 80s, only being warned by dumb parental advisory stickers that made us want stuff more. They are burning books as harmless as my favorite children's book I can no longer get (unless I have an extra 5 grand laying around for a used copy) which was "McElligot's Pool", banned a LONG time before "cancel culture" by Dr. SUESS'S own book company under his name, (ahh but I was just interupted; spam called by Allstate Ins., maybe Samsung's AI can start there?)
I have to read on to see if there's a way around this. Maybe they need to decide who can have a Samsung phone and service without thar if they can prove to be over 18. I mean we send 18 year olds off to war and wonder why they're coming back all scrambled in the head, but we still do it; we haven't taken guns out of the hands of criminals or high risk mentally unstable people....or hey, I live in Colorado, 12 "incidendts" and 61 deaths since 1993 (they started counting there because the beginning of the 1990s to the end of '93 was probably too high to count. Theybdownplay SO MUCH but then ban books about major historical events or books like McElligot's Pool
(Sorry to go off but I'm **bleep** that my phone that costs me as though I'm taking out a new mortgage on a house every time I am forced to get one if I want anything thar doesn't completely leave me behind).

[VerbumVeritum]

There are restrictions on the type of content generative AI, like Gemini, can produce for very good reasons.

[usercksDvNSQuX]

Duh. It's a Yahoo web page not something inappropriate 

[VerbumVeritum]

The topic of the article is inappropriate for a language model. The reason is kind of obvious. It is also very short. A summary seems redundant.

[usercksDvNSQuX]

Uhmm...you seem comfortable with censoring of the unnecessary.

And, who are you to decide what's appropriate or not ?

Instead of acknowledging the obvious, that this model needs work, you choose to double down.

How about "It looks like it needs some work"

[VerbumVeritum]

No one is censoring anything. People are free to read the very short news article. You're right, although I'm not the one deciding, I definitely feel that there should be limits on the type of information language models can provide. This is because they cannot reliably distinguish between morally questionable, ethically objectionable, or radicalized material and information meant to be pedagogical in nature. It's better that they not be allowed to discuss such topics, than to potentially feed individuals misinformation or a skewed perspective.